resource

Land Use in Inner Forests

Part of Learning Guide: Social Equity Considerations for Cities’ Decision Making Related to Inner, Nearby, and Faraway Forests

2. Cities4Forests – Commitment to Social Equity

5. Processes to Enhance Social Equity

6. Social Impacts of Equitable Policies and Programs

7. Other Benefits and Considerations for a Social Equity Approach

8. Policy Commitments for Social Equity

9. Use of Socioeconomic Information

10. Stakeholder Identification

11. Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement

12. Equal Employment Opportunities

13. Equity in Spatial Distribution of Inner Forests

15. Affordability Considerations in Inner Forests

16. Accessibility and Safety Considerations in Inner Forests

17. Ecotourism and Recreation in Nearby Forests

18. Cities’ Engagement with Faraway Forests

19. Community Forest Management in Faraway Forests

20. Faraway Forest Protection and Use Policies

21. Promoting Social Standards in Procurement

24. Selected Resources Part II

Spatial land use analyses are frequently used in plans to protect, manage, and restore forests. Complementing these with social analyses* can help gather additional information on who uses the land and how. In some cases, this may involve identifying informal or extra-legal users of the land, like slum-dwellers and squatter groups, or displaced and migrant communities whose land tenure rights may be constrained. These may be some of the most at-risk groups given their lack of resources or vulnerability due to factors like race, ethnicity, education, etc. In Mumbai, India, for example, governmental action to protect mangrove forests resulted in the destruction of slums, whereas high-end development continued to be allowed in mangrove areas.

Failing to apply a social equity lens to land use decisions can risk inefficient decision making for tree stewardship or site selection for parks and other green spaces. Consider urban greening efforts in Detroit, U.S.: Between 2011-2014, 24% of residents contacted refused to plant trees on their streets as a part of a local non-profit organization’s initiative because “they were left out of the decision-making process” and distrusted relevant authorities in the community.