Urban Forests for Healthier Cities: Policy, Planning, Regulations, and Institutional Arrangements
- Introduction
-
PART I: DEFINING URBAN FOREST CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS
What is an Urban Forest? - What Challenges Do Urban Forests Face?
- Why Do Urban Forests Matter?
- Consider Context
- Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Scales
-
PART II: POLICY, PLANNING, AND REGULATIONS
Introduction to Policy for Urban Forests - Public Space Interventions
- Case Study: Greening Kuala Lumpur
- Introduction to Planning for Urban Forests
- Case Studies: Urban Planning
- Comprehensive and Strategic Plans
- Urban Forest Management Plans
- Case Study: San Francisco, CA, USA
- Case Study: Greening for Resilience in Melbourne, Australia
- Introduction to Regulations for Urban Forests
- Zoning
-
PART III: FUNDING AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
Institutional Arrangements: Part I - Institutional Arrangements: Part II
- Case Study: Evolving Urban Forest Management in Seattle, WA, USA
- Funding and Valuation
- Case Study: Expanding Urban Forests in Curitiba, Brazil
- Challenges
- Gaps in Knowledge
-
PART IV: SUMMARY AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Summary - Selected Resources
- Credits
- References
MENU
- Introduction
-
PART I: DEFINING URBAN FOREST CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS
What is an Urban Forest? - What Challenges Do Urban Forests Face?
- Why Do Urban Forests Matter?
- Consider Context
- Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Scales
-
PART II: POLICY, PLANNING, AND REGULATIONS
Introduction to Policy for Urban Forests - Public Space Interventions
- Case Study: Greening Kuala Lumpur
- Introduction to Planning for Urban Forests
- Case Studies: Urban Planning
- Comprehensive and Strategic Plans
- Urban Forest Management Plans
- Case Study: San Francisco, CA, USA
- Case Study: Greening for Resilience in Melbourne, Australia
- Introduction to Regulations for Urban Forests
- Zoning
-
PART III: FUNDING AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
Institutional Arrangements: Part I - Institutional Arrangements: Part II
- Case Study: Evolving Urban Forest Management in Seattle, WA, USA
- Funding and Valuation
- Case Study: Expanding Urban Forests in Curitiba, Brazil
- Challenges
- Gaps in Knowledge
-
PART IV: SUMMARY AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Summary - Selected Resources
- Credits
- References
Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Scales
Who should care? Many different stakeholders may be affected by urban forests. The list below describes some of the actors to be consulted in the development and implementation of urban forest-related policies and plans:
Federal/National Political Administration
- Political leaders
State/Provincial Departments
- Forestry
- Horticulture
- Agriculture
- Highway/roads
- Irrigation
- Utilities
Municipal Councils
- Parks and gardens
- Town/urban planners
- Landscape architects
- Legal advisors
- Mayors and city leaders
- Policymakers
- Waste managers
- Transportation planners
- Environmental protection departments
- Public works departments
- Hospitals and public health departments
Environmental NGOs
- Local
- International
Donor Agencies
- Bi-lateral (government to government)
- Multi-lateral
Corporate Business
- Multi-national
- National
- Local
Academic Institutions
- Schools
- Universities
- Other research bodies
Local groups of residents
- Associated with the local school
- Associated with local church/temple
- Environmental groups
- Harvesters of tree products
- Neighborhood organizations
Individuals
- Residents of all ages
- Owners/managers of private tree nurseries
- Private tree growers
- Tree wardens
- Urban foragers and gatherers
- Visitors/tourists
- Arborists
- Foresters (both rural and urban)
- Private businesses
(Adapted from Carter, 1995, with additions by authors)
Multiple scales for interventions:
- Micro/local — including site specific considerations related to the air, ground, and soil
- Neighborhood
- City
- Regional
- State/provincial
- National
Urban forests may support larger city goals, such as:
- ResiliencyResilient cities (OECD) – “cities that have the ability to absorb, recover and prepare for future shocks (economic, environmental, social & institutional). Resilient cities promote sustainable development, well-being and inclusive growth” (OECD, 2019) – Utilizing trees to position a city and its residents to withstand or recover faster from risks related to climate change and natural disasters such as heat waves, flooding, or drought.
- Sustainability – Integrating trees into urban landscapes to deliver environmental, social, and economic benefits, such as tree-lined pedestrian walkways along business districts that cool ambient temperatures, promote walking and social interaction, and boost property values and local business revenues.
- Public health – Supporting tree-related policies and plans that increase public contact with nature, encourage physical activity, and reduce exposure to harmful vehicle emissions.
- Safer and more sustainable transportation – Incorporating trees into transportation projects to improve “last mile” connectivity to public transit by reducing vehicle speeds in low speed areas, altering microclimates to promote walking and cycling, and reducing flooding along transportation infrastructure.

Image: Cities4Forests.